It's a good look, but we can read right between your lines, Orac.

A statement of fact cannot be insolent. Unless that fact, should it become public, is a threat to certain activities and interests.

Orac has a particular Modus Operandus, and a very easy task. It is his self appointed role to de-construct fallacy in medicine. Something he does expertly, wittily, and with great precision and thoroughness.

He and his commentariat have infinite patience and capacity with their adversaries in the anti-pashmina movement. No argument or admission goes un-addressed.

Anything Th1Th2 says is given a certain treatment.

Not so, Jacob and Slartibartfastibast who, with their respective offerings of cannabis therapy for autism and the neanderthal admixture hypothesis for autism...

Why no Orac treatment? Could it be that these two hypotheses are a threat in some way to Orac and friends?

What the hell is going on over there?

Our dear Jacob is nowhere to be seen but there is a new troll, this time a yoga troll attempting to bring some definition to 'yoga' since Orac flatly maintains that all yoga is yoga is woo is woo.

I guess he thinks that cancer is cancer too. He's in it for the naked breasts.

Anyway, if anyone is interested in watching a load of insecure unhealthy people squirming it all started here but where will it end? It is looking like he is making Orac & co look stupid in the way that Jacob did so violently and beautifully.

Personally, I find their regular trolls to be utterly boring and Jacob was the only sexy thing about that blog, apart from Orac himself (every woman loves a bastard, I love 'oops' as well).

We search for Vera, Orac writes about Vera. Coincidence...?

Orac posts at midnight NJ time about Vera

What were the spider elves searching for at ~18:45 BST?...




Spooky? Coincidence? Unauthorised Access? Who knows. Them elves moves in multiple mysteriousnessess and many, many, imaginary ways. 

It was there a minute ago....

The NIC has more on Cannabis and it's Anti-Tumour action here..

What does that tell you?

When visiting a new website or blog, of which I probably visit a couple of dozen a day, I always do a search for the other half, see if the two are married yet?

If a 'cannabis' website has no information about cannabis for autism, they are always happy to entertain the concept.

If an 'autism' website has no information about cannabis for autism, they are sometimes happy to entertain.

From that perspective, the odds look good. Examples to come..

Of course, if you go to someone's blog, an autism expert or commentator, there is usually no mention of cannabis therapy. If you bring it up they will accuse you of being off-topic. They will not bring up the topic themselves so there is no 'on-topic' insertion point for correct entry. They fail logic.

All the tricks will be explained here. They are accustomed to combating fallacies rather than a suppressed truth, so they are batting a little curved at this early stage in the game that we control.

First Post

'Silenced by age of autism' has started threatening to silence us so we are doing what we said we would do.

We propose the conjecture: Here is the thread.

Silencedbysilencedbyageofautism is not affiliated with Age of Autism in any way. Whilst we applaud AoA for being an early adopter of cannabis therapy for autism, we have not looked their other offerings or beliefs in great detail so cannot offer opinion or discussion on anything but cannabis for autism or the censorship of cannabis for autism.

We are in agreement with The Unconventional Foundation for Autism , Cannabis Science Inc. , Cannabis for Autism on Facebook and The Liberal Democrats, apparently? I vote according to the colour of the day, not the policies. The parties have colours to help you choose ;)

We receive no financial incentive from any of the above organisations.